Arguments
Phone companies should be forced to compensate people living next to their masts
12 Oct 04:
FOR
•
It should be possible for home owners to sue the operators for the massive damage to their property values.
6 Oct 04:
OTHER INFO
•
Links:-
Mast Action Group -
freespace.virgin.net/mast.action/
Mast Sanity -
www.mastaction.org/network.htm
Planning Sanity -
www.planningsanity.co.uk/
Stewart report -
www.iegmp.org.uk/programme/index.htm
Mast location maps -
www.sitefinder.radio.gov.uk
Phone network info -
www.sitefinder.radio.gov.uk/mobilework.htm
6 Oct 04:
FOR
•
The government says there is no conclusive evidence of health risk - however the government is making a lot of money out of mobile phones so the evidence will never be conclusive.
•
Regardless of whether the mast is a health hazard or not the important point is that there is a 'perceived risk' which has a real and dramatic effect on property values so this should be a valid basis for a planning objection.
•
Its obvious that this has a major impact on the value of their property - probably £25,000 or more
Password:
If you want to input your own topics or arguments see
Help